Shruti vs.
Smriti
All the Hindu scriptures can be classified into two
parts.The first is called Shruti. This form of text is “What has been heard” So
this this means that this knowledge actually came directly from God and so is
considered to be “revealed.” The texts that were written after that were
considered to be what have been remembered, or Smriti. All the texts that come
after the Vedas are considered Smriti because they have been remembered not
revealed. This form of text is more of the traditional texts that have rituals,
codes of law, and stories.
What are some Hindu scriptures that you have heard of
and what are the divisions?
Vedas:
The Vedas are dated back to 1500- 500 BCE also known as
the early Vedic period and is the Sanskrit word for “knowledge”. The
Vedas are the only texts in Hinduism that are Shruti because they are believed
to have been directly revealed thus relating back to the definition of shruti
“what is heard”. The Vedas have four divisions: the Rig Veda, Sama Veda,
Yajur Veda and ArtarvaVeda. From the different divisions you can see that the
Vedas consists of very concrete and ritualistic material. Everything is
very natural and abstract.
QUOTE: “Darkness was hidden by darkness in the
beginning. All this was an indistinguishable sea. That which
becomes, that which was enveloped by the void, that alone was born through the
power of heat.” –RigVeda-
Here we can see that this text is very natural
and abstract especially when it mentions “void”. It really represents the
Rig Veda scripture because of its description of the origins of the world. Here
you can see that it is very broad and does not pertain to a certain individual.
Upanishads:
The actual sanskrit translation for Upanishad is sitting
down near. This refers to the students that sat near their teacher and heard
and learned these texts. Since they are what was remembered by the acharyas -
they are smriti texts. Though they aren’t Sruti, they were written in the vedic
time period towards the end. This is why sometimes they are also referred to as
vedanta because antam means the end so its the end of the vedas. The upanishads
are considered to reveal truths about the nature of ultimate reality which is
brahman, and moksha which a form of human salvation. There are also other
commentaries of the vedas in the upanishads in the form of sutras. As you can
see, the upanishads are still very abstract but here it is more accessible and
organized. These become easier to use than the Vedas.
Dharmashastras:
The dharmashastras were written after the vedic time period and therefore they are considered smriti. In fact, these set of texts have been extracted from the vedas. This very large set of scriptures is the code of law of hindu dharma. It is everyone’s religious and legal duty. Dharmashastra is as much or more about religious life as it is law. However during the time of british colonization, the dharmashastra was used as the law of the land for Hindus in India. The dharmashastra is actually divided into three mains topics - acara, vyavahara, and prayascitta.
The dharmashastras were written after the vedic time period and therefore they are considered smriti. In fact, these set of texts have been extracted from the vedas. This very large set of scriptures is the code of law of hindu dharma. It is everyone’s religious and legal duty. Dharmashastra is as much or more about religious life as it is law. However during the time of british colonization, the dharmashastra was used as the law of the land for Hindus in India. The dharmashastra is actually divided into three mains topics - acara, vyavahara, and prayascitta.
Sruti is what has been revealed directly from
God and smriti is what has been remembered. However, on an everyday basis, not
everyone lives by the vedas. Many people use codes of law such as Dharmashastra
or lessons from stories such as the Bhagavad Gita to live their daily lives
spiritually.
Do you believe one form of scripture is more
important than the other? Do you believe that one warrants more authority than
the other?
Itihasas:
Itihasa were written during the Classical time period.
The Itihasas literally means “so indeed it was” and are refered to as
“historical events.” They are basically stories or epics; thus they are
classified as Smriti because they are “what are heard”. There are three
major epics in Hinduism. Two of them we discussed last meeting: the
Mahabharat and the Ramayan. In both you see that they are stories of
dieties who decended to earth and the conflict between good and evil.
Throughout the epics, different morals and lessons are taught. The
Bhagavad Gita, which is widely known in Hinduism is actually specific part of
the Mahabharat where Krishna teaches Arjun about the importances of Dharma
right before the big battle as well as provide a guide to self realization.
Bhagavad Gita is both Shruti and Smriti.
Krishna is talking so it is “coming from God”
But the Gita was told by a bystander who heard
Krishna talking to Arjun so is Smriti
QUOTE: “He by whom the world is not afflicted
or troubled, who also is not afflicted or troubled by the world, who is freed
from the troubled agitated lower nature and from its waves of joy and fear and
anxiety and resentment, he is dear to Me.”
The vedas do talk about moksha but in a more
broad sense as opposed to a specific individual. However, in this quote
from the Bhagavad Gita, you can see that it is more specific to a certain
individual.
Puranas:
The Puranas are literally translated from Sanskrit to
mean “of ancient times”. They primarily consist of narratives of the
history of the universe from creation to destruction, genealogies of kings,
heroes, sages, and demigods as well as descriptions of Hindu cosmology,
philosophy, and geography! Some examples are stories such as how Ganesh
got his elephant head or the numerous stories of Krishna when he was younger or
the stories of the creation of the universe. So in other words, the
Puranas can be described as Hindu mythology. An important note about the
Puranas is that not all of Hindu mythology comes JUST from the Puranas, a lot
of them do come from the Vedas but most of them are found in the Puranas.
If we look at the transition from vedic
literature to dharmashastra to the itihasa and puranas, there is a shift in the
writing. From a more natural, ritualistic, and abstract form of writing, it
goes to stricter and more specific codes of law to supernatural stories.
Why do you believe this shift took place? Is
it necessarily beneficial or detrimental
Conclusion:
So as we have discussed we can see that there has been
many shifts throughout the texts in Hinduism. Starting with the Vedas and
Upanishads which are very ritualistic and abstract and natural, we then have
the dharmashastras which provided more control by providing codes of law to the
Itihasa or the epics which are very supernatural and involve stories that are
more relatable to us on a day to day basis. But now Hinduims has shifted
again to be more personal and spiritual. So what we would like for y’all
to take away from this meeting is the question: do you think Hinduism will
develop more texts that will reflect this more personal and spiritual
characteristic? and where do you think Hinduism will go towards in the next
couple of hundred years?
There is a shift between the Texts in Hindusim.
Do you
think Hinduism will develop more texts that will reflect a more personal and
spiritual characteristics?
I really like the last question posed at the meeting today about the rise of new Smritis. Personally, I don't think that we will see any new smritis in our time. There are two big reasons for this. First, Hinduism is adopting a culture that is fiercely individualistic. By this I mean that Hinduism is increasingly marketed as a religious that leaves it up to the follower to find their own path to moksha. Why would they need a new smriti to tell them what to do if the focus is on self-discovery? The second reason is the technology culture. Today there is so much information that is available at the click of our fingertips thanks to every device, from our computers and phones to our kitchen appliances. With this expansion of access to the internet, the amount of content available on the internet has also exponentially expanded. This fact combined with the fact that Hinduism has no central authority leads me to worry that any meaningful opinion worthy to become a new smriti will be buried under an avalanche of competing opinions on Hinduism. In other words, since everyone has equal power to post their opinions in the digital age, the opinions written by those well versed in the texts of Hinduism will have to compete with casual commenters like myself for views. Unless Hindus organize more and use the internet in the process of organization, I don't forsee any more smritis.
ReplyDelete-Aneesh